Bear in mind that I don't have thousands of followers and don't follow thousands of people, as seems to be the goal for a lot of people. I'm on Twitter because--as in the "Minute Men defended our Revolutionary Airports" thing by the Dear Leader last week--it can be amusing and is occasionally a place to see good resources float by in the Twitter stream.
But it has changed.
- Famous people (well, authors) who used to tweet a lot, like Margaret Atwood and Lin-Manuel Miranda, don't seem to be as active. My guess is that it's because they are actually, you know, writing instead of wasting time on Twitter as I am, but still.
- There's a lot less interesting, or interesting to me, actual information being circulated.
- There are lots of retweets, the more outrageous the better, of the same information over and over. It's as bad as the NYTimes's months-long "Editor's Picks" on the front page.
- There are a lot more memes, not just funny cat pictures or whatever, but stuff like this:
- Which literary critic or school of criticism are you? Take this quiz and find out.
- How old were you when you had your first (male/nonwhite/gender non-conforming) teacher?
- When is the movie better than the book?
- Who here is a fan of Stranger Things?
- Focus on very particular and sometimes arcane forms of political outrage, while things like the Administration's big gift to Monsanto or whoever of rolling back restrictions on pesticides that kill bees (as our friends in France well know) go completely unnoticed.
- Lots of furious comment threads that any academic program that doesn't have as its primary goal how to organize and destroy the neoliberal university ought to be burned to the ground. Sometimes this is paired with scorching anyone who gives advice on the job market, how to apply for graduate school, etc.
- Lots of comments about the Olds destroying the economy--emphasis on age rather than the real culprit, class and wealth. Thank you, Russian bots, for the "let's you and him fight" nature of this divisiveness that distracts from oligarchy and kleptocracy that is the real problem.
- More pictures of food or daily life things than there used to be.
The rest is pure speculation and observation, based on nothing more than random ideas as research.
But if you're a longtime blogger, doesn't this remind you of something?
Getting-to-know-your-personality memes?
Rage at the (academic) machine?
Little reports from daily life?
Twitter, or my tiny corner of it, seems to be reinventing the early days of blogs, when the blogroll was long and active. Memes? We had 'em, but less so nowadays. Rage? Check. Daily life reports? Check.
If you are on Twitter, have you seen this? Better still, if you're an Instagram user, how is this different on that platform, if it is?
3 comments:
Hmmmm. I started reading around in the blogosphere maybe 2006 and started writing at my current space in 2008. But I was mostly reading in infertility and single motherhood circles, less so the academic one (though I read folks like Dr. Crazy and Profgrrrl--and miss them!). That is, Twitter feels very different to me. And maybe that's purely the issue of scale: lots of minutiae from a lot of people vs. longer things from fewer, deliberately followed people? Of course, my REAL self is on twitter and follows a different crowd than my pseudonymous self who follows other pseudonymous folks on blogs. I'll need to think more on this one.
Not on Twitter, but I sometimes check something on it. IMO, Twitter is for people who are too lazy/short on attention span to blog.
BTW, Gwinne, I read you, but often have trouble commenting.
Dame Eleanor--thanks for letting me know. Do you know what the problem is? I can see if I can figure it out on my end.
Post a Comment