Whether you recognize my subtitle from Gilligan’s Island or from Weird Al’s “Amish Paradise,” you’re still getting the gist of it: teaching old school style. What does it mean this semester?
First of all, a disclaimer: my students this semester are smart and eager to learn, so these things might not work everywhere if, as happens to us all, you have a lethargic or uninterested class. But here are a few changes that evoke the 1990s Days of Yore:
- They write something short every day, on paper, and I collect it. I comment on and return their writing the next day, with handwritten comments, though it’s sometimes only a word or two. These are low-stakes assignments, but they (1) help with attendance, (2) provide guidance (through questions) on the kinds of things that are significant in the reading, and (3) act as a springboard for discussion.
- They also present their findings in class a lot, either alone or in groups after discussion. I listen and take notes and comment.
- If it’s not written in class, it didn’t happen. I’ve had a few try to AI & upload their way to an assignment after it’s been written in class, but nope—in class or it doesn’t count. There are dropped grades to account for absences, etc. Also, those in-class assignments aren’t posted until after the class.
- They’re writing their papers in class, as I mentioned in August and September, and there are usually only a few weeks between some kind of activity or campus-based field trip.
- Said papers (the final drafts) are printed out and returned with handwritten comments.
- If they’re doing group or individual work before coming back to discuss something with the class, they can use their laptops/phones to look things up. Okay, that’s not a 1990 thing to do—but I am walking around & talking with them, making suggestions, and talking with them about what’s on their screens. If they don’t want me to see it, they shouldn’t be looking at it in a class space while working on class work.
- Remember transparencies? (Remember what?). No, I haven’t gone back to those, but I do print out passages for class-based close readings using the doc camera and mark it up as we talk.
- And, of course, there’s the whiteboard notes for discussion. Armed with markers and energy, I still make notes on it (recording their comments) rather than standing at a lectern and doing the same thing on a piece of paper. Why? I’m not sure. It’s something about the space of the whiteboard and moving around in the classroom and darting to the back of it and making eye contact with them rather than with a sheet of paper. I get ideas from them as I’m synthesizing their ideas & asking questions.
I’ve explained to them that I’m trying to provide a space where we can talk, and where they can write, without being called to everything else in their lives. It’s busy out there, and there’s a lot demanding their attention.
So there you have it—my pre-web (though not pre-Internet) 1990 class strategies in 2025. So far, it’s been working.
2 comments:
I love this. How long are your classes? And if you don't mind me asking, do you get students complaining that they need access to their screens for disability reasons? I'm in the UK, and colleagues who have tried banning screens have had pushback on those grounds. (We're also supposed to be saving paper, so printing handouts to use in class instead of posting online is frowned upon.) And how many students do you have? Marking stuff every time seems like a big commitment. I often have 40-60 students taking a class.
All of this! Low-tech instructors unite! I do collect homework online but it's worth nothing, mostly a mechanism for students to keep up with the material and practice solving problems. All the grade comes from in-class exams, which are on paper and graded by a human (me). In some classes I have 5-10 min in-class quizzes that we go over right after they fill them and then students keep them for studying. I spend a lot of time in class solving example problems, drawing, demonstrating reasoning, doing the math etc. I am a big believer in showing all the steps (and $%^$%$ PPTs never do that in a meaningful way).
You noted how beneficial is for the instructor to move around. This my experience 100%. I taught at the lectern during Covid, writing on document camera instead of the board because of distancing, and it just doesn't engage the students the same. I am convinced that instructor's moving around and gesticulating and making eye contact and writing/drawing big in front of them all adds an invaluable dynamic element to the lecture that helps with focus and retention. (I chuckled at your "Armed with markers and energy" because that is exactly my MO.)
Post a Comment